Housing assistance, Standard 30/08/2017 Health, Standard 19/11/2015 Early Childhood, Standard 24/07/2018 Homelessness, Standard 10/08/2018 Tasmanian Health, Endorsed 01/09/2016 Independent Hospital Pricing Authority, Standardisation pending 23/11/2015 Indigenous, Endorsed 16/10/2017 Disability, Standard 29/02/2016 Children and Families, Standardisation pending 24/02/2017 ACT Health, Final 08/08/2018
Definition:
Whether a person identifies as being of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander origin, as represented by a code.
Context:
The purpose of this data element is to provide information about whether persons identify as being of Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander origin.
Neither Aboriginal nor Torres Strait Islander origin
Supplementary values:
9
Not stated/inadequately described
Collection and usage attributes
Guide for use:
This metadata item is based on the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) standard for Indigenous status. For detailed advice on its use and application please refer to the ABS website as indicated in the Reference documents.
The classification for Indigenous status has a hierarchical structure comprising two levels. There are four categories at the detailed level of the classification which are grouped into two categories at the broad level. There is one supplementary category for 'Not stated/inadequately described' responses. The classification is as follows:
Indigenous Australians:
Aboriginal but not Torres Strait Islander origin.
Torres Strait Islander but not Aboriginal origin.
Both Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin.
Non-Indigenous Australians:
Neither Aboriginal nor Torres Strait Islander origin.
Not stated/inadequately described:
This category is not to be available as a valid answer to the questions but is intended for use:
Primarily when importing data from other data collections that do not contain mappable data.
Where the answer cannot be determined without clarification from the respondent (for example, 'No' and 'Yes, Aboriginal' are both selected).
Where an answer was declined.
Where the question was not able to be asked because the client was unable to communicate or a person who knows the client was not available.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2010. National best practice guidelines for collecting Indigenous status in health data sets. Cat. no. IHW 29. Canberra: AIHW. Viewed 29 September 2015, http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=6442468342.
Data element attributes
Collection and usage attributes
Guide for use:
This metadata item is based on the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) standard for Indigenous status. For detailed advice on its use and application please refer to the ABS website as indicated in the Reference documents.
The Indigenous status question allows for more than one response. The procedure for coding multiple responses is as follows:
If the respondent answers 'Yes, Aboriginal' and 'Yes, Torres Strait Islander', then their response should be coded to 'Yes, both Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin'.
If the respondent answers 'No' and one or more of the following: - 'Yes, Aboriginal' - 'Yes, Torres Strait Islander' - 'Yes, both Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander'
then the response should be coded to 'Not stated/inadequately described' if the response cannot be clarified with the respondent.
Collection methods:
The following information provides advice on the recommended way to ask the Indigenous status question.
Self-enumerated collections
For self-enumerated collections (for example, self-completed questionnaires or forms), the following question is recommended:
Q1. [Are you] [Is the person] [Is (name)] of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander origin?
No
Yes, Aboriginal
Yes, Torres Strait Islander
If [you] [the person] [(name)] are of both Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin, answer using both 'Yes' options.
This approach may be problematic in some data collections, for example when data are collected using screen based data capture systems. An additional response category of 'Yes, both Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander' may be included if this better suits the data collection practices of the agency or establishment concerned.
If the Indigenous status question has not been completed on a returned form, this should be followed up and confirmed with the person.
Interviewer-conducted collections
For interviewer-conducted collections in which the Indigenous status of one person is collected, the following question set is recommended:
Q1. Are you of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander origin?
Yes
No (no more questions)
Q2. Are you of Aboriginal origin, Torres Strait Islander origin, or both?
Aboriginal
Torres Strait Islander
Both Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
The first question is used to sequence out non-Indigenous Australians. The second question is used to determine the specific Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander origin of the person. A benefit of this approach is that the interviewer is not required to prompt the respondent with response categories. The 'Both Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander' response category can be included or excluded in interviewer conducted collections depending on which option best suits the data collection practices of the agency concerned. Including the additional response category ensures that respondents are aware of the option to identify as being of both Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander origin.
Various articulations of the standard question are recommended to address the following circumstances:
Person is present and answers
This question wording is recommended where it is known that the person being interviewed is the subject:
Q1. Are you of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander origin?
Q2. Are you of Aboriginal origin, Torres Strait Islander origin, or both?
Person is not present and someone else who knows the person well answers
The following question wording is recommended when another member of the household answers for the person. Examples of such incidents include: parents answering for children, or relatives answering in hospital situations.
Q1. Is [the person] [(name)] of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander origin?
Q2. Is [the person] [(name)] of Aboriginal origin, Torres Strait Islander origin, or both?
Person is deceased and someone else answers on their behalf (for example, death information form)
In these circumstances a close relative or friend should answer. Only if a relative or friend is unavailable should the undertaker or other such person answer. The suggested question wording follows:
Q1. Was [the person] [(name)] of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander origin?
Q2. Was [the person] [(name)] of Aboriginal origin, Torres Strait Islander origin, or both?
Person is an infant and parents answer (e.g. perinatal information form)
In this circumstance it is recommended that parents are asked:
Q1. Is [the baby's] [(name)'s] mother of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander origin?
Q2. Is [the baby's] [(name)'s] mother of Aboriginal origin, Torres Strait Islander origin, or both?
and
Q1. Is [the baby's] [(name)'s] father of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander origin?
Q2. Is [the baby's] [(name)'s] father of Aboriginal origin, Torres Strait Islander origin, or both?
For interview conducted collections in which the Indigenous Status of more than one person is collected from a household representative, the following question set is recommended:
Q1. Is anyone who (usually lives here) (or) (is visiting here) of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander origin?
Yes
No
Q2. Who are they?
Question 3 is asked of each person identified as being of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander origin.
Q3. [Are you] [Is (name)] of Aboriginal origin, Torres Strait Islander origin, or both?
Aboriginal
Torres Strait Islander
Both Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
The first question is used to sequence out households in which no Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people usually live (or are visiting). The second question is used to identify those usual residents (and visitors) of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander origin. This approach eliminates the need to repeatedly ask the Indigenous status question of each individual in a household when data are collected on a single household form. It is particularly advantageous when collecting from areas with a large proportion of households with non-Indigenous Australians.
For both self-enumerated collections and interviewer-conducted collections
The Indigenous status question can be used in circumstances where a close relative, friend, or another member of the household is answering on behalf of the subject. It is strongly recommended that the question be asked directly wherever possible.
When the subject person is not present, the person answering for them should be in a position to do so, that is, this person must know the person about whom the question is being asked well and feel confident to provide accurate information about them.
The Indigenous status question must always be asked regardless of data collectors' perceptions based on appearance or other factors.
The Indigenous status question may only be left unanswered in the following circumstances:
Where the person declined to answer
Where the question was not able to be asked because the client was unable to communicate or a person who knows the client was not available.
Comments:
The following definition, commonly known as 'The Commonwealth Definition', was given in a High Court judgement in the case of Commonwealth v Tasmania (1983) 46 ALR 625.
'An Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander is a person of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent who identifies as an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander and is accepted as such by the community in which he or she lives'.
There are three components to the Commonwealth definition:
descent;
self-identification; and
community acceptance.
In practice, it is not feasible to collect information on the community acceptance part of this definition in general purpose statistical and administrative collections and therefore standard questions on Indigenous status relate to descent and self-identification only.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2010. National best practice guidelines for collecting Indigenous status in health data sets. Cat. no. IHW 29. Canberra: AIHW. Viewed 29 September 2015, http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=6442468342.
Supersedes Person—Indigenous status, code N Housing assistance, Superseded 30/08/2017, Health, Superseded 19/11/2015, Early Childhood, Superseded 24/07/2018, Homelessness, Superseded 10/08/2018, Tasmanian Health, Archived 01/09/2016, WA Health, Endorsed 04/03/2014, Independent Hospital Pricing Authority, Standard 01/11/2012, Indigenous, Archived 16/10/2017, Commonwealth Department of Health, Candidate 16/07/2015, Disability, Superseded 29/02/2016, Children and Families, Standard 22/11/2016, Community Services (retired), Standard 25/08/2005
Implementation in Data Set Specifications: All attributes +
