Person—peripheral neuropathy indicator, code N
Identifying and definitional attributes | |
Metadata item type:![]() | Data Element |
---|---|
Short name:![]() | Peripheral neuropathy (status) |
METEOR identifier:![]() | 302457 |
Registration status:![]() |
|
Definition:![]() | Whether peripheral neuropathy is present, as represented by a code. |
Data Element Concept: | Person—peripheral neuropathy indicator |
Value domain attributes | |||||||
Representational attributes | |||||||
Representation class:![]() | Code | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Data type:![]() | Number | ||||||
Format:![]() | N | ||||||
Maximum character length:![]() | 1 | ||||||
Permissible values:![]() |
| ||||||
Supplementary values:![]() |
| ||||||
Collection and usage attributes | |||||||
Guide for use:![]() | CODE 9 Not stated/inadequately described This code is not for use in primary data collections. | ||||||
Data element attributes | |||||||
Collection and usage attributes | |||||||
Guide for use:![]() | CODE 1 Yes CODE 2 No Record whether or not peripheral neuropathy is present determined by clinical judgement following assessment using pinprick and vibration (using perhaps a Biothesiometer) or Monofilament. | ||||||
Collection methods:![]() | Examine for neuropathy by testing reflexes and sensation preferably using tuning fork (standard vibration fork 128 hz), pinprick, 10g monofilament and/or biothesiometer. The preferred assessment methods are monofilament and biothesiometer. These two non-invasive tests provide more objective and repeatable results than testing sensation with pinprick or a tuning fork, which are very difficult to standardise. 1 The 'Touch-Test' Sensory Evaluation (Semmens-Weinstein Monofilaments) application guidelines:
To assure the validity of the sensory test findings:
2 Testing vibration sensation with a biothesiometer - application guidelines:
The reading is low in young normal individuals (i.e. they are very sensitive to vibration). In older individuals, the biothesiometer reading becomes progressively higher. From experience, it is known that the risk of developing a neuropathic ulcer is much higher if a person has a biothesiometer reading greater than 30-40 volts. | ||||||
Source and reference attributes | |||||||
Submitting organisation:![]() | National Diabetes Data Working Group | ||||||
Origin:![]() | National Diabetes Outcomes Quality Review Initiative (NDOQRIN) data dictionary | ||||||
Reference documents:![]() | 1997 North Coast Medical, INC. San Jose, CA 95125; 800 821 - 9319 Duffy MD, John C and Patout MD, Charles A. 1990. 'Management of the Insensitive Foot in Diabetes: Lessons from Hansen's Disease'. Military Medicine, 155:575-579 Bell- Krotovski OTR, FAOT, FAOTA, Judith and Elizabeth Tomancik LOTR. 1987.The Repeatability of testing with Semmens-Weinstein Monofilaments. 'The Journal of Hand Surgery,' 12A: 155 - 161 Edmonds M, Boulton A, Buckenham T, et al. Report of the Diabetic Foot and Amputation Group. Diabet Med 1996; 13: S27 - 42 Foot Examination -an interactive guide; Aust Prescr 2002; 25:8 - 10 | ||||||
Relational attributes | |||||||
Related metadata references:![]() | Supersedes Person—peripheral neuropathy status, code N
| ||||||
Implementation in Data Set Specifications:![]() All attributes + |
|
Downloading
The download may take a while, please wait.
Do not refresh the screen until the download is complete.