AIHW logo
METEOR logo
Our sites
AIHW GEN Aged Care Data Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
Health Performance Framework
Indigenous Mental Health and
Suicide Prevention Clearinghouse
Australian Mesothelioma Registry Housing data Regional Insights for Indigenous Communities
Contact FAQs
  • Find metadata
    • Find metadata
    • Getting started
    • Data set specifications
    • Indicator sets
    • Data quality statements
    • Data dictionary archives
  • Metadata management
    • Metadata management
    • Data standards
    • Registration authorities
    • Registration statuses
  • How to use METEOR
    • How to use METEOR
    • First steps
    • Using My Page
    • Downloading and printing
    • FAQs
    • About METEOR
  • Learn about metadata
    • Learn about metadata
    • Metadata explained
    • How to create metadata
    • Metadata development resources

Colonoscopy clinical care standard indicators: 1-Proportion of patients scheduled for a colonoscopy whose bowel preparation was adequate

Identifying and definitional attributes

Metadata item type:Help on this termIndicator
Indicator type:Help on this termIndicator
Short name:Help on this term1-Proportion of patients scheduled for a colonoscopy whose bowel preparation was adequate
METEOR identifier:Help on this term721276
Registration status:Help on this term
  • Health, Qualified 19/09/2019
Description:Help on this term

Proportion of patients undergoing a colonoscopy with an adequately prepared bowel.

Indicator set:Help on this termClinical care standard indicators: colonoscopy
Health, Qualified 19/09/2019

Collection and usage attributes

Population group age from:Help on this term

50 years or older

Computation description:Help on this term

The quality of the bowel preparation is based on the colonoscopist's ability to visualise the mucosa after retained stool and fluid have been suctioned away. Bowel preparation should be assessed using a validated assessment tool (see 'Comments' section for examples) or other standardised process. Colonoscopists should document the quality of the bowel preparation for each colonoscopy.

Presented as a percentage.

Computation:Help on this term

(Numerator ÷ Denominator) x 100

Numerator:Help on this term

The number of patients undergoing colonoscopy for whom the procedure note documents that bowel preparation was adequate.

Denominator:Help on this term

The number of patients undergoing colonoscopy.

Comments:Help on this term

Examples of validated tools that can be used to assess bowel preparation include:

  • Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (Calderwood & Jacobson 2010)
  • Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale (Rostom & Jolicoeur 2004)
  • Aronchick Scale (Aronchick et al. 2000).

Representational attributes

Representation class:Help on this termPercentage
Data type:Help on this termReal
Unit of measure:Help on this termService event
Format:Help on this term

N[NN]

Source and reference attributes

Submitting organisation:Help on this term

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care

Reference documents:Help on this term

Aronchick C, Lipshutz W, Wright S, DuFrayne F & Bergman G 2000. A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet phophosoda. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 52:346–352.

Calderwood AH & Jacobson BC 2010. Comprehensive validation of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 72: 686-92.

Rostom A & Jolicoeur E 2004. Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 59:482-6.

Relational attributes

Related metadata references:Help on this term
Supersedes Colonoscopy clinical care standard indicators: 1-Proportion of patients scheduled for a colonoscopy whose bowel preparation was adequate
  • Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, Standard 11/09/2018
  • Health, Standard 26/03/2019
Help
Downloading

The download may take a while, please wait.

Do not refresh the screen until the download is complete.

<Title>

<body>
<footer>
  • View
  • Print view
  • Download
  • Word™
  • Pdf
  • Advanced Download
  • Review
  • Compare items
© Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
Version 1.0.0+20220531.2